<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PaperIQ Weblog - iPhone</title>
    <link>http://www.paperiq.com/blog/</link>
    <description>the pen is mightier than the sword</description>
    
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>PaperIQ Ltd</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:31:55 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.0.7226.0</generator>
    <managingEditor>james.shannon@paperiq.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>james.shannon@paperiq.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.paperiq.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=77f0ff13-b959-4e63-801c-5f446db39d40</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.paperiq.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.paperiq.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,77f0ff13-b959-4e63-801c-5f446db39d40.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>James Shannon</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.paperiq.com/blog/CommentView,guid,77f0ff13-b959-4e63-801c-5f446db39d40.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.paperiq.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=77f0ff13-b959-4e63-801c-5f446db39d40</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
          <img style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-LEFT-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM-WIDTH: 0px; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 10px; BORDER-RIGHT-WIDTH: 0px" height="160" alt="steve_jobs_iphone_apple_logo" src="http://www.paperiq.com/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/iPhone3GHypeorHope_112A9/steve_jobs_iphone_apple_logo_b1ea9945-f966-49ba-b335-9a6e42cdacc8.jpg" width="180" align="right" border="0" /> Another
year, another iPhone. I'm a huge Apple fan - our home now runs four iPods, an AppleTV
and a distributed Airport WiFi network to ensure everything can talk to each other,
anywhere in the house. I think Apple are not only great at industrial design but also
at building consumer electronics devices that 'just work' - that's what I want outside
the day job.
</p>
        <p>
However, the advent of the iPhone 3G (or rather the predictable hype around it) has
caused many of our customers and partners to question: what about an iPhone version
of product x now that the iPhone is enterprise-ready? Are all your corporate customers
going to switch from BlackBerry to iPhone? No &amp; No - or at least not until they've
used one for a day.
</p>
        <p>
Let's not confuse the addition of 'push' (or more accurately poke 'n pull) email to
the iPhone with it becoming enterprise-ready - Windows Mobile has had the same Exchange
ActiveSync support for five years and I haven't noticed that make a significant impact
on BlackBerry's enterprise market share. I won't even mention hot topics such as manageability
and security for large deployments.
</p>
        <p>
But the GTD (Get Things Done) aspect of the BlackBerry is what business users now
take for granted - like copy and paste, searching their Inbox (locally or remotely),
checking availability and creating a meeting invite - all wirelessly from wherever
they happen to be and without a daily battery recharge. This only scratches the surface
of the comparison, but you get the idea. A great browser and media experience are
not going to compensate for the lack of day-to-day business productivity. That's what
won BlackBerry the enterprise market.
</p>
        <p>
This hype has also caught some of the more vocal amongst the BlackBerry developer
community who have been the source of some unrest for a while. Yes, Apple have done
a great job of creating a powerful development environment incorporating a visual
UI designer and a distribution mechanism that allows developers to easily make a living
(albeit giving 30% to Mr Jobs), but once again it's aimed at Apple's core market -
the consumer. How about Bluetooth integration, background processes and secure enterprise
push - all of which are the bread and butter of our enterprise applications - nowhere
to be seen in the iPhone SDK.
</p>
        <p>
The BlackBerry developer experience will improve and RIM are listening - but as anyone
in software knows - it's a little harder and takes a little longer to evolve
an established mobile platform of over 3 years as opposed to starting from scratch.
There are many changes afoot though - new APIs, more powerful hardware and a new <a href="http://supportforums.blackberry.com/rim?category.id=BlackBerryDevelopment" target="_blank">Developers'
Forum</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.blackberrydeveloperconference.com" target="_blank">Developer
Conference</a> already announced. I would therefore caution BlackBerry developers
to really look under the hood of the iPhone SDK before considering its viability -
just as with the business BlackBerry user - we also take many things for granted in
creating mobile enterprise applications that 'just work'.
</p>
        <p>
I therefore don't see the iPhone 3G in the same messianic light that many do - however
Apple have done what Apple have always done best - redefined a product segment and
excited the retail sector and its consumers through powerful marketing, strong industrial
design and excellent usability - but as Yoda would say, "enterprise-ready, it is not".
</p>
        <p>
          <strong>UPDATE:</strong> Gartner just released an in-depth report on the <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;taxonomyName=mobile_and_wireless&amp;articleId=9111526&amp;taxonomyId=15&amp;intsrc=kc_top">iPhone
3G for Enterprise Use</a>.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.paperiq.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=77f0ff13-b959-4e63-801c-5f446db39d40" />
        <br />
        <hr />
Copyright 2008 PaperIQ Ltd. All rights reserved.</body>
      <title>iPhone 3G - Hype or Hope?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paperiq.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,77f0ff13-b959-4e63-801c-5f446db39d40.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.paperiq.com/blog/2008/07/11/iPhone3GHypeOrHope.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:31:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-LEFT-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM-WIDTH: 0px; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 10px; BORDER-RIGHT-WIDTH: 0px" height=160 alt=steve_jobs_iphone_apple_logo src="http://www.paperiq.com/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/iPhone3GHypeorHope_112A9/steve_jobs_iphone_apple_logo_b1ea9945-f966-49ba-b335-9a6e42cdacc8.jpg" width=180 align=right border=0&gt; Another
year, another iPhone. I'm a huge Apple fan - our home now runs four iPods, an AppleTV
and a distributed Airport WiFi network to ensure everything can talk to each other,
anywhere in the house. I think Apple are not only great at industrial design but also
at building consumer electronics devices that 'just work' - that's what I want outside
the day job.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
However, the advent of the iPhone 3G (or rather the predictable hype around it) has
caused many of our customers and partners to question: what about an iPhone version
of product x now that the iPhone is enterprise-ready? Are all your corporate customers
going to switch from BlackBerry to iPhone? No &amp;amp; No - or at least not until they've
used one for a day.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Let's not confuse the addition of 'push' (or more accurately poke 'n pull) email to
the iPhone with it becoming enterprise-ready - Windows Mobile has had the same Exchange
ActiveSync support for five years and I haven't noticed that make a significant impact
on BlackBerry's enterprise market share. I won't even mention hot topics such as manageability
and security for large deployments.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But the GTD (Get Things Done) aspect of the BlackBerry is what business users now
take for granted - like copy and paste, searching their Inbox (locally or remotely),
checking availability and creating a meeting invite - all wirelessly from wherever
they happen to be and without a daily battery recharge. This only scratches the surface
of the comparison, but you get the idea. A great browser and media experience are
not going to compensate for the lack of day-to-day business productivity. That's what
won BlackBerry the enterprise market.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This hype has also caught some of the more vocal amongst the BlackBerry developer
community who have been the source of some unrest for a while. Yes, Apple have done
a great job of creating a powerful development environment incorporating a visual
UI designer and a distribution mechanism that allows developers to easily make a living
(albeit giving 30% to Mr Jobs), but once again it's aimed at Apple's core market -
the consumer. How about Bluetooth integration, background processes and secure enterprise
push - all of which are the bread and butter of our enterprise applications - nowhere
to be seen in the iPhone SDK.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The BlackBerry developer experience will improve and RIM are listening - but as anyone
in software knows - it's a&amp;nbsp;little harder and takes a little longer to evolve
an established mobile platform of over 3 years as opposed to starting from scratch.
There are many changes afoot though - new APIs, more powerful hardware and a new &lt;a href="http://supportforums.blackberry.com/rim?category.id=BlackBerryDevelopment" target=_blank&gt;Developers'
Forum&lt;/a&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;a href="http://www.blackberrydeveloperconference.com" target=_blank&gt;Developer
Conference&lt;/a&gt; already announced. I would therefore caution BlackBerry developers
to really look under the hood of the iPhone SDK before considering its viability -
just as with the business BlackBerry user - we also take many things for granted in
creating mobile enterprise applications that 'just work'.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I therefore don't see the iPhone 3G in the same messianic light that many do - however
Apple have done what Apple have always done best - redefined a product segment and
excited the retail sector and its consumers through powerful marketing, strong industrial
design and excellent usability - but as Yoda would say, "enterprise-ready, it is not".
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;UPDATE:&lt;/strong&gt; Gartner just released an in-depth&amp;nbsp;report on the &lt;a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;taxonomyName=mobile_and_wireless&amp;amp;articleId=9111526&amp;amp;taxonomyId=15&amp;amp;intsrc=kc_top"&gt;iPhone
3G for&amp;nbsp;Enterprise Use&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.paperiq.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=77f0ff13-b959-4e63-801c-5f446db39d40" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;Copyright 2008 PaperIQ Ltd. All rights reserved.</description>
      <comments>http://www.paperiq.com/blog/CommentView,guid,77f0ff13-b959-4e63-801c-5f446db39d40.aspx</comments>
      <category>BlackBerry</category>
      <category>iPhone</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>